Follow us : Twitter LinkedIn
Conseils en Propriété Industrielle / European Patent and Trademark Attorneys
Client Login
Home > Publications > Search for a publication

Search a publication

Title of Intellectual Property
Patents
European and Unitary Patent
US Patent
Trademark
European Union trademark
International Trademark
Design
Domain names
Software
Copyright
Theme
Patentability of Biological Material
Arbitration and Mediation
Contracts
Infringement
Regulation, Labelling
Data
Wine and Spirits
Pharmacy
Well-known TM, Dilution, Use
Accelerated Examination
European patent
Immunotherapy
Biodiversity
Brexit
Biomarkers
Author name

Search result

19 publications

Opinion on the patentability of your invention by the 5 IP5 Offices. It's now possible at the international stage!

By Soizic GUINDEUIL, Senior Associate.
Guindeuil_search.jpg The IP5 offices have launched a collaborative search and examination pilot project to provide a written opinion on the patentability of an invention by these five offices, as early as the international stage, and thus without waiting for the initiation of national phase examination procedures.
Published on: 22th May 2019

Breaking News : the question of the patentability of plants/animals obtained exclusively by means of an essentially biological process has once again been referred o the EPO's enlarged board of appeal!

By Gabrielle FAURE-ANDRE and Philippe BESSIERE, French and European Patent Attorneys.
GAFPB.PNG It is now official: the President of the European Patent Office (EPO), António Campinos, has done what he said he would do… in asking, once again, the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal to rule on the patentability exclusion introduced into new Rule 28(2) EPC.
Published on: 19th April 2019

35 USC § 101: Further clarification of patent subject-matter eligibility.

By Sara HAINES, US Patent Agent.
S.Haines.jpg Two recently issued USPTO memorandums further clarify aspects of patent subject-matter eligibility under 35 USC § 101. The Vanda memo1 specifies methods of treatment that should be considered to be patent eligible under step 2A of the Alice/Mayo test2 thereby avoiding any further analysis under step 2B, while the Berkheimer memo3 states that examiners must provide substantiated evidence when additional claim elements are considered to represent well-understood, routine, conventional activity in support of 35 USC § 101 rejections under step 2B.
Published on: 30th Oct 2018

Isolated Nucleic Acids are no Longer Patentable in Australia

By Frédérique FAIVRE PETIT, Partner
vignette F.FAIVRE-PETIT (3).jpg On 7 October 2015, the High Court of Australia ruled in favour of the non-patentability of isolated nucleic acids.
Published on: 15th Oct 2015

Human Embryonic Stem Cell Patentability in Europe and the United States

By Gabrielle FAURE-ANDRE, French and European Patent Attorney
v2387-Gabrielle FAURE-ANDRE.jpg Today, the position of the European Patent Office (EPO) as to the patentability of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) is clear. A European patent can only protect an invention involving such cells if, at the "relevant date", the cells could be obtained by means other than the destruction of a human embryo.
Published on: 25th Jun 2015

The Unpatentability of a Dosage Claim is no Longer a French Exception

By Anne BOGARD BOUTARIC, Partner
v2191-Anne BOUTARIC.jpg There is no doubt that substances or compounds used in medical treatments are explicitly recognised as meeting the criterion for patentability.
Published on: 25th Feb 2015

The US patent system (still) requires more than the laws of Nature…

By Frédérique FAIVRE PETIT, Partner
vignette F.FAIVRE-PETIT (3).jpg US patent law is probably one of the most lenient in the world: it provides for no exclusion in principle and requires solely that an invention must be, as a first condition, useful (within the meaning of 35 USC 101) before it is examined from the viewpoint of "conventional" patentability criteria such as novelty and inventive step.
Published on: 28th Jul 2014

Plant Patentability - Bis Repetita !

By Philippe BESSIERE, French and European Patent Attorney
BESSIERE_SEARCH_2013.jpg Second referral to the Enlarged Board of Appeal and Mandatory suspension of pending proceedings.
Published on: 25th Jan 2014

MYRIAD: Over 30 years of practice is being revisited by the United States Supreme Court:Isolated DNA is now longer patentable! Hard times for United States protected biotechnology inventions

Frédérique FAIVRE PETIT, Partner
vignette F.FAIVRE-PETIT (3).jpg The Biotechnology industry has been decidedly mistreated by recent decisions in the US which are disrupting over 30 years of practice concerning the protection of inventions relating to or involving genes. This is creating a great uncertainty about the value of corresponding US patents.
Published on: 1st Jul 2013

Patentability of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines

By Gabrielle FAURE-ANDRE, French Patent Attorney
v2387-Gabrielle FAURE-ANDRE.jpg While the Brüstle vs. Greenpeace decision does not aim to influence the European Patent Office (EPO), we nevertheless anticipated that it may well result in the hardening of the EPO’s position concerning the patentability of human embryonic stem cell lines...
Published on: 14th Jun 2013

Myriad : Second confirmation of patentability of isolated DNA. Will this be the final chapter?

By Frédérique FAIVRE PETIT, Partner
vignette F.FAIVRE-PETIT (3).jpg For the third time, an American Court has decided on patentability of «genes», confirming the previous decision, which reversed the first one…. But let us start from the beginning.
Published on: 19th Sept 2012

Are patents and diagnostic methods compatible? Europe - United States - Canada - Brazil - India - China - Japan - Korea - Australia

By FAIVRE PETIT Frédérique, Partner
vignette F.FAIVRE-PETIT (3).jpg Whereas one might think ideally medicine should one day be able to diagnose everything, this has not been achieved yet, although... The pharmaceutical and diagnosis industries...
Published on: 2nd Jul 2012

MAYO V. PROMETHEUS

By Franck TETAZ, Partner
F.Tetaz 65x65.jpg How the Supreme Court of the United States of America has made a distinction between a patentable invention and a scientific discovery, thus creating new difficulties in protecting inventions in the area of diagnostic research in this country.
Published on: 16th May 2012

Patentability of embryonic stem cells - after the European Patent Office, the European Court of Justice gives its opinion

By Gabrielle FAURE-ANDRE, IP engineer
v2387-Gabrielle FAURE-ANDRE.jpg Pursuant to Article 6(2)(c) of Directive 98/44/EC of the European Patent Convention (EPC), the use of «human embryos» for industrial or commercial purposes is not patentable.
Published on: 14th Feb 2012

G2/07 - How EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal interpretes the expression "essentially biological process" under A.53(B) EPC

By Franck TETAZ, Partner, and Lucile VERNOUX, European Patent Attorney, Cabinet REGIMBEAU
The question of the patentability of plants was a struggle of the last century.
Published on: 14th Jun 2011

G1/07 : Answers, and answers between the lines

By Stéphanie Célaire - European and French Patent Attorney - Cabinet REGIMBEAU
v2417-Stéphanie CELAIRE.jpg Decision G001/07 was eagerly awaited in the field of medical imaging methods for diagnostic purposes.
Published on: 8th April 2010

Laws on Bioethics in France

By Frédérique Faivre Petit, French and European Patent Attorney, Partner - Cabinet REGIMBEAU
vignette F.FAIVRE-PETIT (3).jpg Laws on Bioethics were first laid down in France in 1994. The principle then set out by the law-maker was that they should be reviewed after 5 years.
Published on: 4th Sept 2009

G3/08 Patentability of software : Details expected from the Enlarged Board of Appeal

By Jean-Robert CALLON DE LAMARCK, Partner, European and French Patent Attorney
J.R.Callon 65x65.jpg The debate on software patentability in Europe has been for a long time a source of polemics and legal uncertainty for both patent applicants and third parties.
Published on: 17th April 2009

Case G 2/07 : Coming soon, an interpretation of the expression « Essentially biological process» by the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal

By Franck TETAZ, Partner, Cabinet REGIMBEAU And Lucile VERNOUX, IP Engineer, Cabinet REGIMBEAU
v5671- Lucille VERNOUX.jpg Decision G 1/98, later taken up in the “biotechnologies” directive, validated the patentability of plants produced through genetic engineering and their preparation processes when they are not limited....
Published on: 1st Feb 2008